So many reasons not to vote for the imitation Obama
candidate (also known as the “Me-too” candidate.)
Let us review.
Women Rights:
Obama : Passed several pieces of legislation that helps
thousands of women across the nation.
Other Guy : “Me-too!
I hired some women as a gesture.”
And that’s why so many people got an uneasy feeling about
the “Me-Too” candidates answer. Obama
passes laws to help thousands of women nationwide, while the other guy just
gives an example of a gesture.
Used Cars:
Obama : Not a good salesman. Ask him the price and he’ll tell you what he
paid for it.
Other Guy : A total used car salesman. I’m surprised he doesn’t show up with bright
white shoes and a green polyester suite.
No matter what anybody says, his reply is, “I want the same
thing…” then he baits you off the subject and babbles. Maybe its just me, I don’t listen to
salesmen if they don’t give a direct answer…I allow explanation, if one is
needed. But if I say I want a lower
price and they start talking about tires…I walk.
In other words, his debate was a “bait and switch”
performance. He’s making sure everybody
hears what they want to hear. After the
election is when the switch part comes in.
Right now, he’s just taking Independents for a ride.
Economy :
Obama : Set in motion long term policies, rules on
wall street, banks, investments in education, infastructure and clean
energy. These things will insure an
economically independent America. The
downside is, most are long term and you don’t see an immediate return.
Other Guy : Wants to gain points on other peoples
suffering. Ignores the fact that our
economy almost collapsed, and wants to profit from the fact that the economy
wasn’t fixed overnight.
Back around 2010 I predicted that the only reason a sane
person in Congress would vote against infrastructure bills, that would help the
nation and put people back to work is that they are trying to sabotage the
economy to stop Obama from being re-elected.
In the words of Congress, “Its not about getting people
jobs, its about stopping Obama from keeping his.”
Boehner was on TV almost everyday saying that the economy is
getting worse and worse. As we know
now, the during the great depression, people became afraid of the situation,
started hoarding money and not spending, and jobs were lost and it spiraled out
of control. It seemed to me, Boehner
was trying to fuel a depression.
That’s the odd thing about American prejudice. In other countries, a person who you are
prejudice against may come in your store, but you still are nice and sell them
goods and take their money…its common sense.
But in the U.S. people would not allow blacks from spending money in
their store, even if they needed the business…they would take economic hardship
over common sense. And that’s exactly
what it looked like Boehner was doing back in 2009…only it was your potential
job he was sacrificing.
This is why after Obama is elected, our work is only half
finished. We have to vote out the
“Party of No Accomplishments” and elect a party that wants to benefit Americans
and not themselves. Whether the
candidate is Republican or Democrat, we need folks that just want to get the job
done.
This is why the “me too” candidate keeps jumping back to the
economy. The “Party of No
Accomplishment” has invested YOUR welfare to get elected…it was a big gamble,
but now that it’s done, it’s the only ammunition he has.
We were told back when the economy collapsed that a long
term solution would take time…and it has.
That’s the difference between a quick fix, and a solution. For example, bettering education is a long
term solution.
Foreign Policy:
Obama : Stopped the economic hemorrhaging from two
wars, has al-Qaeda on the run, and Iran is collapsing economically.
Other Guy : In cahoots with al-Qaeda.
No he’s not on the phone plotting terrorists attacks, that
would be crazy to even suggest.
But I do believe he is the unwitting patsy playing into
their hands. Let’s face it, under Obama,
al-Qaeda is on the run. They
orchestrated a last ditch effort, in the hopes it would help get someone else
elected. I don’t suspect they even care
who it is, as long as it’s not Obama, because he has taken out most their old
top leaders…and by taken out, I mean they are no longer alive. Harsh but effective.
If al-Qaeda gets a president who offers “knee-jerk”
reactions to every incident, the chances of the US going into another
middle-eastern war is increased. If we
do that, our resources will be tapped again and al-Qaeda will have the
breathing room they need to build up.
The “me too” candidate has played right into the al-Qaeda
playbook by escalating the importance of that incident and ignoring other
variables that effect the middle east.
The Big Debate:
If you want to really make the “me too” candidate look
foolish, don’t argue.
Simply let him know that you appreciate that he’s seen the
error of his ways from a year ago, and adopted yet another Obama policy (he’s
already pulling the bait and switch on his base).
The Future:
So what does the future hold for us? I suspect Obama will win.
Contrary to popular belief, The Tea Party will become more
energized and convince the Republicans that they should have went with “their
guy”. So the Republicans will become
insanely Tea Party-rrific, and loose the majority in Congress, ‘cause everybody
knows the “party of no” means “no achivement.”
Then Republicans will become desperate and follow the tea
party advice for a Presidential nomination in 2016 and loose again, because as
long as you refuse to compromise the longer your list of failures will become…
COMING NEXT: Hmmm, da cat-town races?
No comments:
Post a Comment